One of the unsettling aspects of the challenge to Tennessee’s bar on risky gender-transition interventions for minors in United States v. Skrmetti, the case being argued before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, is its fabrication of a scientific “consensus” that does not in fact exist. One particularly interesting amicus brief in the case comes from Alabama, submitted by its attorney general, Steve Marshall. It focuses on the evidence that was effectively buried by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) when it sought to eliminate age limits for sterilizing chemical treatments and surgeries. Alabama has a law similar to Tennessee’s that was subject to a court challenge, and from that litigation came some troubling revelations…
Click HERE to Read More