Search
Close this search box.

JCN Launches New Confirm Kavanaugh Ad in Indiana; Releases Fresh Polling Data Showing Majority of Hoosiers Support Judge Kavanaugh’s Confirmation

WASHINGTON – The Judicial Crisis Network today released a new ad in Indiana accompanied by polling research focused on red-state Democrats in Indiana, West Virginia, North Dakota, and Alabama. JCN’s latest ad highlights Judge Kavanaugh’s qualifications, fairness, independence, and adherence to the Constitution. It also calls on Senator Donnelly to stand with his constituents and not with Senator Chuck Schumer and radical liberals.

Accompanying the ad is fresh polling from North Star Opinion Research (Whit Ayres) that shows a majority of voters in Indiana (as well as West Virginia, North Dakota, and Alabama) support confirming Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The polling also shows that Independents in Indiana solidly support Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

This is a $1.5 million buy throughout Indiana, West Virginia, North Dakota, and Alabama. Since the president nominated Judge Kavanaugh July 9, 2018, JCN has spent $4.5 million on ads with more than $2 million allocated specifically to Indiana, West Virginia, North Dakota, and Alabama. JCN’s ad buy total in Indiana alone amounts to almost $700,000 to date.

Statement from Judicial Crisis Network’s Chief Counsel and Policy Director, Carrie Severino:

“Judge Kavanaugh is a fair and independent judge who bases his decisions on the Constitution, which is why President Trump nominated him and why a lopsided majority of Hoosiers support his confirmation. Senator Donnelly has a choice: Stand with the people of Indiana and support President Trump’s extraordinarily qualified Supreme Court nominee, or stand with Chuck Schumer and be a rubber stamp for the extreme liberal special interests.”

Click here to view

###

Get Connected

Receive email updates and breaking news alerts

STAND WITH US

Help us raise money and share our cause

LATEST VIDEOS

View the latest videos on breaking news and issues driving the judicial landscape